|
Frank Peter Slotkus
John H. Hamline Elementary School |
 |
One of the most interesting features of Melvyn P. Leffler's The
Specter of Communism is its ability to analyze the origins
of the Cold War without placing blame on either of the two superpowers
or their political ideologies. Leffler's thesis is that both the
Soviets and the Americans were at fault for the conditions that
caused the former WWII allies to become enemies. This fascinating
book was a breath of fresh air for an American student who grew
up with the notion that both the USSR and its citizens were "evil".
The greatest aspect of this book is not always what it answers,
but rather, the questions that it elicits from the reader. This
historical account is not for the passive reader. In other words,
Leffler presents his readers with facts that they may already
have known, but he goes the extra mile when he offers prompts
to take a closer look at the information that is being put forth.
The three major questions that came to mind when reading this
account concerning the origins of the Cold War were as follows:
First, what political conditions caused the USSR not to occupy
all of Germany after WWII? Due to the losses of life and resources
that they suffered, the Soviets certainly could have presented
a convincing argument as to why they should have been in absolute
control of defeated Germany. On that same note, reading this book
led me to wonder why the Americans were allowed to occupy Germany.
The United States were never formally attacked by Germany as Great
Britain, France, and Russia had been. Another issue that sparked
my curiosity was the American monopoly of the atomic bomb. It
is common knowledge that the Americans were in sole possession
of nuclear technology from 1945-1949, but a new question began
to develop upon the completion of this book. Why didn't the Americans
flaunt their military might and use fear of this new invention
to their utmost advantage? The last question that materialized
was whether or not the ordinary Soviet citizens were as inundated
with anti-American propaganda as previous generations of Americans
had been concerning the Soviets.
Central to Leffler's research is that both the USSR and the USA
were responsible for the Cold War. He often blames individuals,
rather than ideologies for the establishment of the two opposing
camps. For example, the author points out that the stalemate known
as Korea was at the time, an American escalation of the Cold War.
Simply put, Truman, an ardent anti-communist comparable to his contemporary
Churchill, was as forceful as he was with the Korean situation because
he had already lost China to communism. On the other hand, Leffler
clearly blames Stalin's fear of American economic superiority for
the blockade of Berlin. This nonbiased view of events relating to
the origins of the Cold War is a reoccurring theme within the work.
In conclusion, Leffler's book is concise and to the point. It is
written in a way that is informative, but never dull. Even the most
novice students of history can appreciate this type of writing.
Not only can this work further serve to aid the students' understanding
of the Cold War, but it can also teach them about the dangerous
effects of an uncompromising attitude or philosophy. The study of
history gives us lessons for the present and this book reinforces
this theory. With knowledge of the pitfalls concerning the Cold
War, one can learn to better understand those who don't necessarily
share their own beliefs, culture, religion, etc. Lastly, it is extremely
interesting to note that Leffler often refers to the fact that the
United States saw communism as an ideology that would ultimately
lead to the abandonment of American freedoms and principles because
of the need to set up a garrison state in America. Strangely, the
conditions found within this theoretical garrison state are not
unlike those found in post-September 11th America. Hopefully, we
as a people can apply the lessons learned during the Cold War to
this new political, economic and social landscape.
Return to Reactions
to Assigned Readings index |